门静脉高压患者脾切断流术后曲张静脉再出血的危险因素分析

赵晓飞; 林栋栋; 李宁; 臧运金; 郭庆良; 武聚山

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2018.10.023

门静脉高压患者脾切断流术后曲张静脉再出血的危险因素分析

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2018.10.023

首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院普外科

详细信息

中图分类号: R657.34
计量
- 文章访问数: 2162
- HTML全文浏览量: 57
- PDF下载量: 361
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 出版日期: 2018-10-20

Risk factors for variceal rebleeding after esophagogastric devascularization and splenectomy in patients with portal hypertension

Department of General Surgery, Beijing YouAn Hospital, Capital Medical University

摘要

摘要:
目的分析门静脉高压患者脾切断流术后影响曲张静脉再出血的相关因素。方法回顾性分析北京佑安医院2010年4月-2015年9月收治的244例门静脉高压行脾切断流术患者的临床资料,根据曲张静脉是否再出血分为未出血组和再出血组。对比分析两组术前、术中及术后临床资料。正态分布的计量资料组间比较采用t检验,非正态分布数据组间比较采用Wilcoxon秩和检验,计数资料组间比较采用χ2检验。将单因素分析结果具有统计学意义的变量进行logistic多因素回归分析。结果 244例患者中38例（15. 6%）出现曲张静脉再出血。单因素分析显示,两组患者在曲张静脉出血史、术前腹水、术后TBil、断流后门静脉压力、切脾前门静脉压力、切脾后门静脉压力、术前INR等方面的差异具有统计学意义（χ2值分别为5. 530、4. 120,t值分别为3. 591、4. 098、2. 516、2. 622、4. 278,P值分别为0. 016、0. 026、0. 008、0. 002、0. 022、0. 012、0. 003）。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,患者的曲张静脉破裂出血史（95%可信区间:1. 113
- 肝硬化 /
- 高血压,门静脉 /
- 食管和胃静脉曲张 /
- 脾切除术
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the risk factors for variceal rebleeding after esophagogastric devascularization and splenectomy in patients with portal hypertension. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 244 patients with portal hypertension who were admitted to Beijing YouAn Hospital from April 2010 to September 2015 and underwent esophagogastric devascularization and splenectomy. According to the presence or absence of variceal rebleeding, these patients were divided into non-rebleeding group and rebleeding group. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinical data were compared between the two groups. The t-test was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between groups, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed data between groups; the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed for statistically significant variables identified by the univariate analysis. Results Of all 244 patients, 38 ( 15. 6%) experienced variceal rebleeding. The univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences between the two groups in the history of variceal bleeding, preoperative ascites, total bilirubin after surgery, portal venous pressure after devascularization, portal venous pressure before and after splenectomy, and preoperative international normalized ratio ( χ2= 5. 530、4. 120, t = 3. 591、4. 098、2. 516、2. 622、4. 278, P = 0. 016, 0. 026, 0. 008, 0. 002, 0. 022, 0. 012, and 0. 003) . The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that variceal rebleeding after esophagogastric devascularization and splenectomy was associated with the history of variceal bleeding ( 95% CI:1. 113-13. 704, P = 0. 033) , preoperative ascites ( 95% CI: 1. 257-5. 437, P = 0. 010) , and portal venous pressure after devascularization ( 95% CI: 1. 022-1. 172, P = 0. 010) . Conclusion History of variceal bleeding, preoperative ascites, and portal venous pressure after devascularization are independent risk factors for variceal rebleeding after esophagogastric devascularization and splenectomy.
- liver cirrhosis /
- hypertension, portal /
- splenectomy /
- esophageal and gastric varices

HTML全文

参考文献(10)

[1]ZHOU GW.The choice of surgical module for the treatment of portal hypertension in the era of liver transplantation[J].Chin J Bases Clin General Surg, 2013, 20 (1) :10-12. (in Chinese) 周光文.肝移植时代门静脉高压症外科手术方式的选择[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2013, 20 (1) :10-12.

[2]WEN JS, YUE K, WU ZQ, et al.Comparative clinical analysis of three surgical methods in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension complicated by upper gastrointestinal bleeding[J].J Clin Hepatol, 2016, 32 (2) :264-268. (in Chinese) 温建生, 岳琨, 吴智群, 等.肝硬化门静脉高压并发上消化道出血的3种手术方式比较分析[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2016, 32 (2) :264-268.

[3]YANG Z.Current status and perspectives of surgical treatment of portal hypertension[J].J Clin Hepatol, 2016, 32 (2) :250-253. (in Chinese) 杨镇.我国门静脉高压症外科治疗的现况和展望[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2016, 32 (2) :250-253.

[4]BAO HK, WEI XL.Comparisons of clinical effect of hand-assisted laparoscopic and open splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization for the treatment of portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis[J].Chin J Med Offic, 2016, 44 (1) :92-94, 97. (in Chinese) 包汉康, 韦秀丽.手助腹腔镜与开腹脾切除贲门周围血管离断术治疗肝硬化门脉高压症的疗效比较[J].临床军医杂志, 2016, 44 (1) :92-94, 97.

[5]WANG M, WEN TF, YAN LN, et al.Comparison on effects of liver transplantation and periesophagogastric devascularization with splenectomy for portal hypertension and cir rhosis with liver function of Child Grade A[J].Chin J Bases Clin General Surg, 2013, 20:18-23.

[6]WU S, WU Z, ZHANG X, et al.The incidence and risk factors of portal vein system thrombosis after splenectomy and pericardial devascularization[J].Turk J Gastroenterol, 2015, 26 (5) :423-428.

[7]VOROS D, POLYDOROU A, POLYMENEAS G, et al.Longterm results with the modifed Sugiura procedure for the management of variceal bleeding:Standing the test of time in the treatment of bleeding esophageal varices[J].World J Surg, 2012, 36:659-666.

[8]MICHAEL HENDERSON J.Surgical treatment of portal hypertension[J].Baillière's Clin Gastroenterol, 2000, 14 (4) :911-925.

[9]DAGENAIS M, LANGER B, TAYLOR BR, et al.Experience with radical esophagogastric devascularization procedures (Sugiura) for variceal bleeding outside Japan[J].World J Surg, 1994, 18:222-228.

[10]MA XX, LI TX, WANG ZW, et al.Treatment strategy for upper gastrointestinal rebleeding after devascularization operation in portal hypertension patients:A report of 56 cases[J].Chin J Gen Surg, 2007, 16 (4) :353-355. (in Chinese) 马秀现, 李天晓, 王志伟, 等.门静脉高压断流术后上消化道再出血的治疗策略:附56例报告[J].中国普通外科杂志, 2007, 16 (4) :353-355.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计