加速康复外科理念在胰腺外科中的应用与思考

田孝东; 杨尹默

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.05.006

加速康复外科理念在胰腺外科中的应用与思考

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.05.006

北京大学第一医院外科

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目(81871954,81672353,81572339)；

详细信息

中图分类号: R657.5
计量
- 文章访问数: 1334
- HTML全文浏览量: 33
- PDF下载量: 291
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-03-29
- 出版日期: 2019-05-20

Application and thinking of the concept of enhance recovery after surgery in pancreatic surgery

Department of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital

Research funding:

摘要

摘要: 近年来,加速康复外科(ERAS)理念及路径在我国临床实践被广泛认同与开展,在胰腺外科领域中也逐步开展。由于胰腺外科手术具有疾病复杂、手术难度大、术后并发症发生率高等客观因素,导致ERAS理念在胰腺外科的临床应用在不同胰腺中心差异较大,其相关路径的开展与应用显著滞后于其他学科。目前,ERAS理念在胰腺外科中应用效果的的高级别循证医学证据仍较为缺乏,需要开展高质量临床研究证实其安全性和有效性。评述了目前胰腺外科开展ERAS的可行性及相关热点问题,供同道参考。
- 胰腺疾病 /
- 外科学 /
- 加速康复外科 /
- 胰十二指肠切除术
Abstract: In recent years, the concept and clinical path of enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS) have been widely accepted and applied in clinical practice in China, and it is gradually used in the field of pancreatic surgery. Objective factors such as complexity of disease, difficulties in pancreatic surgeries, and a high incidence rate of postoperative complications have led to the great difference in the clinical application of ERAS concept across pancreas centers, and the application and implementation of related clinical paths in this field is still late than that in other disciplines. At present, there is still a lack of high-level evidence for the application effect of the ERAS concept in pancreatic surgery, and high-quality clinical trials are needed to confirm its safety and efficacy. This article reviews the feasibility of the implementation of ERAS in pancreatic surgery and other hot topics, so as to provide a reference for the research in this field.
- pancreatic diseases /
- surgery /
- enhance recovery after surgery /
- pancreaticoduodenectomy

HTML全文

参考文献(26)

[1] LASSEN K, COOLSEN MM, SLIM K, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy:Enhanced RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY (ERAS®) Society recommendations[J]. Clin Nutr, 2012, 31 (6) :817-830.

[2] Chinese Research Hospital Association, Society for Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery. Expert consensus for enhanced recovery after hepatobiliary&pancreatic surgery (2015 edition) [J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2016, 32 (6) :1040-1045. (in Chinese) 中国研究型医院学会肝胆胰外科专业委员会.肝胆胰外科术后加速康复专家共识 (2015版) [J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2016, 32 (6) :1040-1045.

[3] Chinese Society of Surgery, Chinese Medical Association;Chinese Society of Anesthesiology, Chinese Medical Association. Chinese consensus and clinical guidelines for enhanced recovery after surgery (2018 editon) [J]. Chin J Pract Surg, 2018, 38 (1) :1-20. (in Chinese) 中华医学会外科学分会, 中华医学会麻醉学分会.加速康复外科中国专家共识及路径管理指南 (2018版) [J].中国实用外科杂志, 2018, 38 (1) :1-20.

[4] JI HB, ZHU WT, WEI Q, et al. Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery:A meta-analysis[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2018, 24 (15) :1666-1678.

[5] BRAGA M, PECORELLI N, ARIOTTI R, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. World J Surg, 2014, 38 (11) :2960-2966.

[6] AGARWAL V, THOMAS MJ, JOSHI R, et al. Improved outcomes in 394 pancreatic cancer resections:The impact of enhanced recovery pathway[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2018, 22 (10) :1732-1742.

[7] BAI XL, ZHANG XY, LU FY, et al. Application of enhanced recovery after hepatopancreatobiliary surgery:A single-center experience[J]. Chin J Dig Surg, 2016, 15 (1) :35-41. (in Chinese) 白雪莉, 张晓雨, 卢芳燕, 等.肝胆胰外科术后加速康复实施单中心经验[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2016, 15 (1) :35-41.

[8] BAI X, ZHANG X, LU F, et al. The implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program following pancreatic surgery in an academic medical center of China[J].Pancreatology, 2016, 16 (4) :665-670.

[9] LYU N, LU ZP, LI Q, et al. Application value of enhanced recovery after surgery in the pancreatic surgery[J]. Chin J Dig Surg, 2016, 15 (6) :547-551. (in Chinese) 吕楠, 陆子鹏, 李强, 等.加速康复外科在胰腺手术中的应用价值[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2016, 15 (6) :547-551.

[10] COOLSEN MM, BAKENS M, van DAM RM, et al. Implementing an enhanced recovery program after pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients:Is it feasible?[J]. World J Surg, 2015, 39 (1) :251-258.

[11] KAMAN L, CHAKARBATHI K, GUPTA A, et al. Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on immediate surgical outcome in elderly patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Updates Surg, 2019.[Epub ahead of print]

[12] PARTELLI S, CRIPPA S, CASTAGNANI R, et al. Evaluation of an enhanced recovery protocol after pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients[J]. HPB (Oxford) , 2016, 18 (2) :153-158.

[13] FISHER WE, HODGES SE, SILBERFEIN EJ, et al. Pancreatic resection without routine intraperitoneal drainage[J]. HPB (Oxford) , 2011, 13 (7) :503-510.

[14] CONLON KC, LABOW D, LEUNG D, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection[J]. Ann Surg, 2001, 234 (4) :487-494.

[15] BEHRMAN SW, ZARZAUR BL, PARMAR A, et al. Routine drainage of the operative bed following elective distal pancreatectomy does not reduce the occurrence of complications[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2015, 19 (1) :72-79.

[16] WITZIGMANN H, DIENER MK, KIENKÖTTER S, et al. No need for routine drainage after pancreatic head resection:The dualcenter, randomized, controlled PANDRA trial (ISRCTN04937707) [J]. Ann Surg, 2016, 264 (3) :528-537.

[17] DIENER MK, TADJALLI-MEHR K, MEHR KT, et al. Riskbenefit assessment of closed intra-abdominal drains after pancreatic surgery:A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the current state of evidence[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2011, 396 (1) :41-52.

[18] van BUREN G, BLOOMSTON M, HUGHES SJ, et al. A randomized prospective multicenter trial of pancreaticoduodenectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage[J]. Ann Surg, 2014, 259 (4) :605-612.

[19] ZELGA P, ALI JM, BRAIS R, et al. Negative predictive value of drain amylase concentration for development of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Pancreatology, 2015, 15 (2) :179-184.

[20] SERENE T, G SV, PADMAKUMAR JS, et al. Predictive value of post-operative drain amylase levels for post-operative pancreatic fistula[J]. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2018, 22 (4) :397-404.

[21] ven FONG Z, CORREA-GALLEGO C, FERRONE CR, et al.Early drain removal—the middle ground between the drain versus no drain debate in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy:A prospective validation study[J]. Ann Surg, 2015, 262 (2) :378-383.

[22] STAUFFER JA, COPPOLA A, VILLACRESES D, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma:Long-term results at a single institution[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31 (5) :2233-2241.

[23] CORREA-GALLEGO C, DINKELSPIEL HE, SULIMANOFF I, et al. Minimally-invasive vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy:Systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2014, 218 (1) :129-139.

[24] CROOME KP, FARNELL MB, QUE FG, et al. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma:Oncologic advantages over open approaches?[J]. Ann Surg, 2014, 260 (4) :633-640.

[25] DOKMAK S, FTÉRICHE FS, AUSSILHOU B, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy should not be routine for resection of periampullary tumors[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2015, 220 (5) :831-838.

[26] ADAM MA, CHOUDHURY K, DINAN MA, et al. Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer:Practice patterns and short-term outcomes among 7061 patients[J]. Ann Surg, 2015, 262 (2) :372-377.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计