中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

流式荧光免疫法检测原发性胆汁性胆管炎自身抗体的价值与临床应用

王战 王麟 姚远 刘静 孙桂荣 刘明军

引用本文:
Citation:

流式荧光免疫法检测原发性胆汁性胆管炎自身抗体的价值与临床应用

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.10.025
基金项目: 

青岛大学附属医院青年科研基金 (20141201)

详细信息
    通信作者:

    刘明军,jocklmj@163.com

  • 中图分类号: R575.22

Value and clinical application of multiplex bead-based flow fluorescent immunoassay in the detection of autoantibodies in primary biliary cholangitis

Research funding: 

Scientific Research Fund of The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (20141201)

  • 摘要:   目的  对多重微球流式荧光免疫法(MBFFI)检测抗线粒体抗体(AMA)M2亚型、抗核孔膜蛋白抗体(gp210抗体)与抗核体蛋白抗体(sp100抗体)结果进行分析,并评估其对原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC)的诊断价值。  方法  选取2018年8月—2020年6月于青岛大学附属医院就诊并临床确诊的PBC患者340例(PBC组),其他疾病组143例,健康体检者117例。应用MBFFI与免疫印迹法(IBT)分别检测受试者血清中AMA-M2、gp210、sp100 3种自身抗体,用Kappa检验比较两种方法对同一种自身抗体检测结果的一致性;应用受试者工作特征曲线评估MBFFI检测3种抗体对PBC的诊断价值;阳性率的比较采用χ2检验。  结果  PBC组中两种方法检测一致性最好的抗体为AMA-M2(Kappa=0.874),gp210与sp100抗体的一致性较好(Kappa=0.713,Kappa=0.749)。MBFFI检测AMA-M2抗体的敏感度(72.06%)最高;联合检测gp210与sp100两种抗体的敏感度(44.71%)高于单项抗体,联合检测AMA-M2、gp210与sp100 3种抗体的敏感度(82.65%)高于单项抗体。3种抗体联合检测诊断PBC的受试者工作特征曲线下面积最大(0.907 0)。  结论  MBFFI检测PBC自身抗体与IBT检测结果一致性较好。MBFFI联合检测AMA-M2、gp210和sp100抗体诊断PBC的敏感度更高,诊断价值更大。

     

  • 图  1  MBFFI检测AMA-M2、gp210、sp100 3种抗体的ROC曲线

    表  1  MBFFI与IBT检测所有样本总体一致性比较

    抗体 阳性率[例(%)] 一致率(%) Kappa指数
    MBFFI IBT
    AMA-M2 262(43.67) 255(42.50) 94.83 0.895
    gp210 103(17.17) 110(18.33) 91.50 0.709
    sp100 87(14.50) 62(10.33) 93.83 0.718
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  MBFFI与IBT对PBC组患者血清自身抗体检测结果比较

    抗体 阳性率[例(%)] 一致率(%) Kappa指数
    MBFFI IBT
    AMA-M2 245(72.06) 250(73.53) 95.00 0.874
    gp210 96(28.24) 100(29.41) 88.24 0.713
    sp100 76(22.35) 57(16.76) 92.05 0.749
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  MBFFI检测AMA-M2、gp210与sp100抗体的诊断性能

    项目 敏感度 特异度 阳性预测值 阴性预测值 假阳性率(误诊率) 假阴性率(漏诊率) 约登指数 阳性似然比 阴性似然比 ROC曲线下面积 95% CI
    AMA-M2 72.06% 93.54% 93.51% 72.14% 6.46% 27.94% 0.66 11.15 0.30 0.850 3 0.819 4~0.881 3
    gp210 28.24% 97.34% 93.20% 51.20% 2.66% 71.76% 0.26 10.61 0.74 0.703 9 0.660 3~0.744 8
    sp100 22.35% 95.82% 87.36% 48.84% 4.18% 77.65% 0.18 5.34 0.81 0.635 2 0.591 3~0.679 1
    gp210+sp100 44.71% 93.49% 89.94% 56.48% 6.51% 55.29% 0.38 6.86 0.59 0.742 0 0.703 3~0.780 7
    AMA-M2+gp210+sp100 82.65% 88.12% 90.06% 79.58% 11.88% 17.35% 0.71 6.96 0.20 0.907 0 0.884 0~0.929 9
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Chinese Society of Rheumatology. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune liver disease[J]. Chin J Rheumatol, 2011, 15(8): 556-558. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-7480.2011.08.011.

    中华医学会风湿病学分会. 自身免疫性肝病诊断和治疗指南[J]. 中华风湿病学杂志, 2011, 15(8): 556-558. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-7480.2011.08.011.
    [2] QIU DK, MA X. The diagnosis and management of autoimmune liver diseases[J]. Chin J Hepatol, 2005, 13(1): 66-67. DOI: 10.3760/j.issn:1007-3418.2005.01.016.

    邱德凯, 马雄. 自身免疫性肝病的诊断和治疗[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2005, 13(1): 66-67. DOI: 10.3760/j.issn:1007-3418.2005.01.016.
    [3] HIRSCHFIELD GM, DYSON JK, ALEXANDER G, et al. The British Society of Gastroenterology/UK-PBC primary biliary cholangitis treatment and management guidelines[J]. Gut, 2018, 67(9): 1568-1594. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315259.
    [4] European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: The diagnosis and management of patients with primary biliary cholangitis[J]. J Hepatol, 2017, 67(1): 145-172. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.03.022.
    [5] DANG FT, TANG YM. Diagnostic and prognostic value of autoantibodies in primary biliary cholangitis[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2020, 36(5): 1164-1166. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.05.048.

    党富涛, 唐映梅. 自身抗体在原发性胆汁性胆管炎中的诊断及预后价值[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2020, 36(5): 1164-1166. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.05.048.
    [6] RESHETNYAK VI. Primary biliary cirrhosis: Clinical and laboratory criteria for its diagnosis[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(25): 7683-7708. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i25.7683.
    [7] BRAUN S, BERG C, BUCK S, et al. Catalytic domain of PDC-E2 contains epitopes recognized by antimitochondrial antibodies in primary biliary cirrhosis[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2010, 16(8): 973-981. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i8.973
    [8] WANG CX, WANG JJ. Laboratory diagnosis of primary biliary cholangitis[J/CD]. Chin J Clin Lab Manage (Electronic Edition), 2017, 5(4): 197-199. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.2017.04.002.

    王春霞, 王佳佳. 原发性胆汁性胆管炎的实验室诊断[J/CD]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2017, 5(4): 197-199. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.2017.04.002.
    [9] LIN H, LU ML, WANG Y. The current status of biomarkers in primary biliary cholangitis[J]. Labeled Immunoassays Clin Med, 2020, 27(7): 1261-1265. DOI: 10.11748/bjmy.issn.1006-1703.2020.07.036.

    林花, 路明亮, 王勇. 原发性胆汁性胆管炎的生物标志物研究进展[J]. 标记免疫分析与临床, 2020, 27(7): 1261-1265. DOI: 10.11748/bjmy.issn.1006-1703.2020.07.036.
    [10] SUN CY, MA X. An excerpt of EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: the diagnosis and management of patients with primary biliary cholangitis(2017)[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2017, 33(10): 1888-1894. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.10.008.

    孙春燕, 马雄. 《2017年欧洲肝病学会临床实践指南: 原发性胆汁性胆管炎的诊断和管理》摘译[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2017, 33(10): 1888-1894. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.10.008.
    [11] PEREZ D, GILBURD B, AZOULAY D, et al. Antinuclear antibodies: Is the indirect immunofluorescence still the gold standard or should be replaced by solid phase assays?[J]. Autoimmun Rev, 2018, 17(6): 548-552. DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.12.008.
    [12] NIU GH, GAO YJ, ZHANG C, et al. Establishment and clinical application of multiplex flow cytometric immuno-bead array assay technology in detecting primary Sjogren's syndrome[J]. Lab Med Clin, 2016, 13(14): 1911-1913. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2016.14.003.

    牛广华, 高玉洁, 张程, 等. 流式免疫多重微球芯片技术检测干燥综合征自身抗体的评价及应用[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2016, 13(14): 1911-1913. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2016.14.003.
    [13] CUI NN, WANG QX, MA X. An excerpt of diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis in adults and children: 2019 practice guidance and guidelines from the American Association for the study of liver diseases[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2020, 36(4): 758-763. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.04.009.

    崔娜娜, 王绮夏, 马雄. 《2019年美国肝病学会实践指引和指南: 成人和儿童自身免疫性肝炎的诊断与治疗》摘译[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2020, 36(4): 758-763. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.04.009.
    [14] XIE CH, LI ZJ. Diagnosis and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. Chin J Gen Prac, 2020, 18(4): 527-528.

    谢长好, 李志军. 系统性红斑狼疮的诊断与治疗[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(4): 527-528.
    [15] SHANG XY, YU T, SUN GR, et al. Evaluation and clinical application of a multiplex bead-based flow fluorescent immunoassay for detection of antinuclear antibody spectrum[J]. Chin J Immunol, 2019, 35(3): 331-334. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-484X.2019.03.016.

    尚晓莹, 于腾, 孙桂荣, 等. 多重微球流式荧光免疫技术检测抗核抗体谱的评价与临床应用[J]. 中国免疫学杂志, 2019, 35(3): 331-334. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-484X.2019.03.016.
    [16] de LISO F, MATINATO C, RONCHI M, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers for diagnosis of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA)-negative PBC patients: A review of literature[J]. Clin Chem Med, 2017, 56(1): 25-31. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0249.
    [17] XIAO JG, PAN XY. Detection of autoantibodies in autoimmune liver disease[J/CD]. Clin Lab J (Electronic Edition), 2018, 7(2): 366.

    肖金根, 潘细牙. 自身免疫性肝病的自身抗体检测技术探讨[J/CD]. 临床检验杂志(电子版), 2018, 7(2): 366.
    [18] PENG L, WANG KZ. Research progress in clinical application and experimental diagnosis of autoantibodies[J]. Int J Lab Med, 2015, 36(10): 1425-1428. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4130.2015.10.047.

    彭玲, 王开正. 自身抗体临床应用及实验诊断研究进展[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2015, 36(10): 1425-1428. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4130.2015.10.047.
    [19] VILLALTA D, SEAMAN A, TIONGSON M, et al. Evaluation of a novel extended automated particle-based multi-analyte assay for the detection of autoantibodies in the diagnosis of primary biliary cholangitis[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2020, 58(9): 1499-1507. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0122.
    [20] ZHANG Q, LIU Z, WU S, et al. Meta-analysis of antinuclear antibodies in the diagnosis of antimitochondrial antibody-negative primary biliary cholangitis[J]. Gastroenterol Res Pract, 2019, 2019: 8959103. DOI: 10.1155/2019/8959103.
  • 加载中
图(1) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  478
  • HTML全文浏览量:  205
  • PDF下载量:  33
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-02-23
  • 录用日期:  2021-03-29
  • 出版日期:  2021-10-20
  • 分享
  • 用微信扫码二维码

    分享至好友和朋友圈

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回