中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

磁共振IDEAL-IQ技术对急性胰腺炎患者脂肪与铁沉积的诊断效能分析

范慧芳 陈强 原小军 罗琳

引用本文:
Citation:

磁共振IDEAL-IQ技术对急性胰腺炎患者脂肪与铁沉积的诊断效能分析

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.10.022
基金项目: 

包头医学院科学研究基金项目 (BYJJ-QM201753)

伦理学声明:本研究方案于2022年1月7日经由包头医学院第一附属医院伦理委员会审批,批号:20210012。所有受检者均自愿参加本研究并签署知情同意书。
利益冲突声明:本研究不存在研究者、伦理委员会成员、受试者监护人以及与公开研究成果有关的利益冲突。
作者贡献声明:范慧芳负责文献检索,撰写文章;罗琳对研究的思路或设计有关键贡献,并参与了研究数据的获取分析解释过程;陈强、原小军负责文章的整体指导,审核以及修改完善。
详细信息
    通信作者:

    罗琳,byll117@sina.com

Efficacy of magnetic resonance IDEAL-IQ technique in diagnosis of fat and iron deposition in acute pancreatitis

Research funding: 

Scientific Research Foundation Project of Baotou Medical College (BYJJ-QM201753)

More Information
  • 摘要:   目的  利用IDEAL-IQ技术定量参数脂肪分量(FF)和弛豫率(R2*)对急性胰腺炎(AP)患者胰腺内脂肪沉积和铁沉积进行量化评估,评价其诊断AP的效能。  方法  纳入2020年10月—2021年10月于内蒙古科技大学包头医学院第一附属医院诊治的AP患者72例为AP组,以同期82例健康体检者为对照组。两组研究对象应用GE 3.0T MRI行腹部IDEAL-IQ序列检查,并在MR后处理工作站测量胰腺FF及R2*值。符合正态性分布的计量资料两组间比较采用t检验;不符合正态分布的计量资料两组间比较采用非参数Mann-Whitney U检验。差异有统计学意义的参数进行受试者工作特征曲线分析。以曲线下面积作为评价参数诊断效能的指标。  结果  病例组中FF值显著高于对照组(Z=-10.01,P<0.001),AP组中R2*值高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.73,P<0.001);而轻度与中重度AP间FF和R2*值的差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05);FF值和R2*值诊断AP的敏感度分别为100%、48.6%,特异度分别为90.2%、86.6%。  结论  磁共振IDEAL-IQ技术定量参数FF值诊断AP的灵敏度和特异度均较高,是诊断AP的特异性指标,具有很好的临床应用前景。

     

  • 图  1  AP患者IDEAL-IQ序列重建图像及ROI勾画图示

    注:a,水像显示肿胀胰腺的轮廓(白色虚线);b,FF图;c,R2*图。分别于FF图和R2*图在胰头(1)、胰体(2)、胰尾(3)勾画ROI(箭头)。

    Figure  1.  IDEAL-IQ sequence reconstruction image and ROI sketching diagram

    图  2  胰腺FF和R2*值诊断AP效能的ROC曲线

    Figure  2.  ROC curve of pancreatic FF and R2* values for diagnosis of AP

    表  1  MRSI评分标准

    Table  1.   MRSI scoring system

    MRI表现 评分
    胰腺炎症评分
      未见明显异常 0
      局灶性或弥漫性胰腺增大 1
      腺体内信号异常伴胰周脂肪炎性改变 2
      单处的、无明确边界的积液或蜂窝组织炎块 3
      2处或2处以上无明确边界的积液或积气 4
    胰腺坏死评分1)
      无坏死 0
      <30% 2
      30%~50% 4
      >50% 6
    注:MRSI=胰腺炎症评分+坏死评分;1)胰腺坏死的判断标准,T1WI呈低信号,T2WI呈低信号或高信号,增强扫描动脉期、静脉期图像均未见明显强化。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  腹部MRI平扫及增强扫描主要参数

    Table  2.   Main parameters of abdominal MRI plain scan and enhanced scan

    项目 扫描序列 TR(ms) TE(ms) FOV(cm) 层厚(mm) 翻转角
    MRI平扫
      T1WI轴位 快速干扰相梯度回波序列 4.2 1.1/2.2 40×32 5 15°
      T2WI轴位 单次激发快速自旋回波序列 7500 76.1 40×40 7 110°
      T2WI抑脂 快速恢复自旋回波饱和脂肪抑制序列 9000 76.1 40×40 7 110°
      T2WI冠位 单次激发快速自旋回波序列 2211 76.1 42×42 6 90°
    MRI增强 肝脏快速容积成像序列 3.5 1.3 40×32 5 15°
    注:TR,重复时间;TE,回波时间;FOV,视野。所有受试者在屏气状态下行IDEAL-IQ序列扫描,扫描参数为TR 6.6 ms,TE 0.9~4.8 ms,激励次数0.50,FOV 44 cm×44 cm,层厚8 mm,相位数160,翻转角3°,扫描时间18 s。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  病例组与对照组FF及R2*值的比较

    Table  3.   Comparison of FF and R2* between the case and control group

    参数 AP组(n=72) 对照组(n=82) Z P
    FF(%) 9.23(7.51~12.33) 3.02(2.00~3.85) -10.01 <0.001
    R2*(Hz) 37.05(25.33~53.56) 28.18(23.85~35.53) -3.73 <0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  轻度与中重度AP患者胰腺FF及R2*值的比较

    Table  4.   Comparison of pancreatic FF and R2* values between mild group and moderately severe to severe group of AP patients

    参数 轻度(n=50) 中重度(n=22) Z P
    FF(%) 9.80(7.44~12.75) 8.30(7.88~10.32) -1.032 0.299
    R2*(Hz) 39.27(27.44~53.62) 33.22(23.96~54.97) -0.274 0.741
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] LANKISCH PG, APTE M, BANKS PA. Acute pancreatitis[J]. Lancet, 2015, 386(9988): 85-96. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60649-8.
    [2] Chinese Society for Emergency Medicine; Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Alliance of Emergency Treatment and First Aid; Emergency Medicine Branch, Beijing Medical Association, et al. Expert consensus on emergency diagnosis and treatment of acute pancreatits[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2021, 37(5): 1034-1041. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.05.012.

    中华医学会急诊分会, 京津冀急诊急救联盟, 北京医学会急诊分会, 等. 急性胰腺炎急诊诊断及治疗专家共识[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2021, 37(5): 1034-1041. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.05.012.
    [3] QUICLET C, DITTBERNER N, GÄSSLER A, et al. Pancreatic adipocytes mediate hypersecretion of insulin in diabetes-susceptible mice[J]. Metabolism, 2019, 97: 9-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2019.05.005.
    [4] YAMAZAKI H, TSUBOYA T, KATANUMA A, et al. Lack of independent association between fatty pancreas and incidence of type 2 diabetes: 5-year Japanese cohort study[J]. Diabetes Care, 2016, 39(10): 1677-1683. DOI: 10.2337/dc16-0074.
    [5] WONG VW, WONG GL, YEUNG DK, et al. Fatty pancreas, insulin resistance, and β-cell function: a population study using fat-water magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2014, 109(4): 589-597. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2014.1.
    [6] ALEMPIJEVIC T, DRAGASEVIC S, ZEC S, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty pancreas disease[J]. Postgrad Med J, 2017, 93(1098): 226-230. DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134546.
    [7] ACHARYA C, CLINE RA, JALIGAMA D, et al. Fibrosis reduces severity of acute-on-chronic pancreatitis in humans[J]. Gastroenterology, 2013, 145(2): 466-475. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.05.012.
    [8] REEDER SB, PINEDA AR, WEN Z, et al. Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL): application with fast spin-echo imaging[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2005, 54(3): 636-644. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20624.
    [9] XIONG XQ, LIN QT, SITU DK, et al. Application of new magnetic resonance water-fat separation technology IDEAL-IQ[J]. J Jinan Univ (Natural Science and Medicine Edition), 2020, 41(5): 427-433. DOI: 10.11778/j.jdxb.2020.05.007.

    熊晓晴, 林绮婷, 司徒定坤, 等. 磁共振水脂分离新技术IDEAL-IQ的应用[J]. 暨南大学学报(自然科学与医学版), 2020, 41(5): 427-433. DOI: 10.11778/j.jdxb.2020.05.007.
    [10] SERAI SD, DILLMAN JR, TROUT AT. Proton density fat fraction measurements at 1.5- and 3-T hepatic MR imaging: Same-day agreement among readers and across two imager manufacturers[J]. Radiology, 2017, 284(1): 244-254. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017161786.
    [11] WILDMAN-TOBRINER B, MIDDLETON MM, MOYLAN CA, et al. Association between magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction and liver histology features in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis[J]. Gastroenterology, 2018, 155(5): 1428-1435. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.018.
    [12] BANKS PA, BOLLEN TL, DERVENIS C, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus[J]. Gut, 2013, 62(1): 102-111. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779.
    [13] TANG W, ZHANG XM, XIAO B, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging versus Acute Physiology And Chronic Healthy Evaluation Ⅱ score in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2011, 80(3): 637-642. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.08.020.
    [14] NIU CY, WU FX. Research status of fatty pancreas[J]. World J Chin Dig, 2018, 26(21): 1280-1288. DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v26.i21.1280

    牛春燕, 吴方雄. 脂肪胰的研究现状[J]. 世界华人消化杂志, 2018, 26(21): 1280-1288. DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v26.i21.1280.
    [15] ZENG XP, HU LH, LI ZS. Research progress of fatty pancreas[J]. Chin J Pancreatol, 2016, 16(1): 68-72. DOI: 10.3760/cma.J.issn.1674-1935.2016.01.022.

    曾祥鹏, 胡良皞, 李兆申. 脂肪胰的研究进展[J]. 中华胰腺病杂志, 2016, 16(1): 68-72. DOI: 10.3760/cma.J.issn.1674-1935.2016.01.022.
    [16] SMITS MM, VAN GEENEN EJ. The clinical significance of pancreatic steatosis[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2011, 8(3): 169-177. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2011.4.
    [17] NAVINA S, ACHARYA C, DELANY JP, et al. Lipotoxicity causes multisystem organ failure and exacerbates acute pancreatitis in obesity[J]. Sci Transl Med, 2011, 3(107): 107ra110. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002573.
    [18] ACHARYA C, NAVINA S, SINGH VP. Role of pancreatic fat in the outcomes of pancreatitis[J]. Pancreatology, 2014, 14(5): 403-408. DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2014.06.004.
    [19] KANG GH, CRUITE I, SHIEHMORTEZA M, et al. Reproducibility of MRI-determined proton density fat fraction across two different MR scanner platforms[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2011, 34(4): 928-934. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22701.
    [20] HUANG MY, CHENG JL, LYU XT, et al. IDEAL-IQ and MRS in quantitative assessment of liver fat content[J]. Radiol Pract, 2017, 32(5): 447-450. DOI: 10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2017.05.004.

    黄梦月, 程敬亮, 吕晓婷, 等. IDEAL-IQ与MRS定量测量肝脏脂肪含量的可行性及相关性[J]. 放射学实践, 2017, 32(5): 447-450. DOI: 10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2017.05.004.
    [21] LIU ML, HUANG XH, XU HX, et al. Potential role of IDEAL-IQ sequence for quantitative assessment of fat and iron deposition in pancreas with acute pancreatitis[J]. Radiol Pract, 2018, 33(12): 1266-1271. DOI: 10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2018.12.008.

    刘梦苓, 黄小华, 徐红霞, 等. 磁共振IDEAL-IQ序列对急性胰腺炎状态下胰腺脂肪沉积和铁沉积的评估[J]. 放射学实践, 2018, 33(12): 1266-1271. DOI: 10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2018.12.008.
    [22] GUO RM, TANG WJ, ZHU YQ, et al. Diagnostic value of MRI IDEAL-IQ sequence to hepatic steatosis and hepatic iron-overloaded[J]. J Sun Yat-Sen Univ (Medical Sciences), 2015, 36(5): 689-692. DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).2015.0111.

    郭若汨, 唐文杰, 朱叶青, 等. 磁共振IDEAL-IQ序列对肝脏脂肪变性和铁过载的诊断价值[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2015, 36(5): 689-692. DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).2015.0111.
    [23] MORAN RA, GARCÍA-RAYADO G, DE LA IGLESIA-GARCÍA D, et al. Influence of age, body mass index and comorbidity on major outcomes in acute pancreatitis, a prospective nation-wide multicentre study[J]. United European Gastroenterol J, 2018, 6(10): 1508-1518. DOI: 10.1177/2050640618798155.
    [24] SZENTESI A, PÁRNICZKY A, VINCZE Á, et al. Multiple hits in acute pancreatitis: components of metabolic syndrome synergize each other's deteriorating effects[J]. Front Physiol, 2019, 10: 1202. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01202.
    [25] ZHANG ZC, LIN QS, HUANG YC, et al. Application of high field MR IDEAL-IQ in acute pancreatitis[J]. J Clin Radiol, 2018, 37(12): 2006-2009. DOI: 10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2018.12.014.

    张志诚, 林钱森, 黄永础, 等. 高场磁共振IDEAL-IQ技术在急性胰腺炎中的应用价值研究[J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2018, 37(12): 2006-2009. DOI: 10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2018.12.014.
  • 加载中
图(2) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  459
  • HTML全文浏览量:  166
  • PDF下载量:  47
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-02-07
  • 录用日期:  2022-03-19
  • 出版日期:  2022-10-20
  • 分享
  • 用微信扫码二维码

    分享至好友和朋友圈

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回