血清尿酸/肌酐比值与非酒精性脂肪性肝病的相关性分析

邵翠萍; 徐有青

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.10.018

血清尿酸/肌酐比值与非酒精性脂肪性肝病的相关性分析

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.10.018

邵翠萍,
徐有青^,

首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院消化内科，北京 100070

基金项目:

国家科技重大专项课题 (2016ZX10002011)

详细信息

通信作者:
徐有青，youqingxuttyy@163.com

中图分类号: R575.5
计量
- 文章访问数: 797
- HTML全文浏览量: 136
- PDF下载量: 83
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-02-03
- 录用日期: 2021-02-23
- 出版日期: 2021-10-20

Association of serum uric acid-to-creatinine ratio with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Cuiping SHAO,
Youqing XU^,

Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China

Research funding:

National Science and Technology Major Project (2016ZX10002011)

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨血清尿酸(sUA)/肌酐(Cr)比值和非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)的相关性。方法回顾性选取2020年1月— 2020年12月就诊于首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院的97例NAFLD患者(NAFLD组)，根据腹部超声检查结果将NAFLD患者分为轻度(n=33)、中度(n=31)、重度(n=33)3组。另选取同期于本院体检的36例健康成人作为对照组。比较各组间性别、年龄、空腹血糖(FBS)、ALT、AST、TC、TG、高密度脂蛋白(HDL)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)、GGT、sUA、sCr、sUA/Cr水平。正态分布的计量资料2组间比较采用独立样本t检验，3组间比较采用方差分析；非正态分布计量资料组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验；计数资料组间比较采用χ²检验。相关性分析采用Spearman检验；采用多因素logistic回归分析NAFLD相关的危险因素。结果 NAFLD组ALT、AST、TG、GGT、sUA、sUA/Cr水平均显著高于健康对照组(Z=-4.881、Z=-4.616、Z=-4.221、Z=-3.563、t=12.974、t=10.710，P值均＜0.05)，而HDL水平则显著低于健康对照组(Z=-5.682，P＜0.05)。NAFLD的脂肪肝严重程度(轻中重)与ALT、TC、LDL呈正相关(r值分别为0.291、0.272、0.253，P值均＜0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示，sUA/Cr是发生NAFLD的独立危险因素(OR=1.885，95%CI：1.162~3.060，P＜0.05)。结论 sUA/Cr与NAFLD具有显著相关性，是NAFLD发生的独立预测因素。可以通过监测sUA/Cr的水平来预测NAFLD的发生，以期早发现、早诊断、早治疗，从而改善预后。
- 非酒精性脂肪性肝病 /
- 尿酸 /
- 肌酐
Abstract: Objective To investigate the association of serum uric acid (sUA)-to-creatinine (Cr) ratio with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 97 patients with NAFLD (NAFLD group) who attended Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, from January to December 2020, and according to the results of abdominal ultrasound, they were divided into mild group with 33 patients, moderate group with 31 patients, and severe group with 33 patients. Related data were also collected from 36 healthy adults (control group) who underwent physical examination in our hospital during the same period of time. The above groups were compared in terms of sex, age, fasting blood glucose, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), sUA, serum Cr, and sUA/Cr ratio. The independent samples t- test was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between two groups, and an analysis of variance was used for comparison between three groups; the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous data between groups; the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups. The Spearman test was used for correlation analysis, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the risk factors for NAFLD. Results Compared with the control group, the NAFLD group had significantly higher levels of ALT, AST, TG, GGT, sUA, and sUA/Cr ratio (Z=-4.881, -4.616, -4.221, and -3.563, t=12.974 and 10.710, all P < 0.05) and a significantly lower level of HDL (Z=-5.682, P < 0.05). The severity of NAFLD (mild, moderate or severe) was positively correlated with ALT, TC, and LDL (r=0.291, 0.272, and 0.253, all P < 0.05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that sUA/Cr ratio was an independent risk factor for NAFLD (odds ratio=1.885, 95% confidence interval: 1.162-3.06, P < 0.05). Conclusion There is a significant correlation between sUA/Cr ratio and NAFLD, and sUA/Cr ratio is an independent predictive factor for NAFLD. The sUA/Cr ratio can be monitored to predict the onset of NAFLD, so as to achieve early identification, early diagnosis, and early treatment and improve prognosis.
- Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease /
- Uric Acid /
- Creatinine

HTML全文

表 1 NAFLD组与健康对照组临床资料比较

项目	NAFLD组(n=97)	健康对照组(n=36)	统计值	P值
男性[例(%)]	62(63.9)	25(69.4)	χ²=0.354	0.682
年龄(岁)	44(34~55)	39(34~52)	Z=-1.353	0.176
FBS(mmol/L)	5.15(4.69~6.28)	5.05(4.78~5.39)	Z=-1.473	0.141
ALT(U/L)	36.7(21.5~58.6)	14.6(11.6~20.0)	Z=-4.881	＜0.001
AST(U/L)	23.6(18.4~35.7)	15.6(13.5~17.8)	Z=-4.616	＜0.001
TC(mmol/L)	4.53(3.66~5.37)	4.67(3.88~5.23)	Z=-0.765	0.444
TG(mmol/L)	1.71(1.03~2.72)	0.95(0.62~1.32)	Z=-4.221	＜0.001
HDL(mmol/L)	1.14(1.00~1.38)	1.58(1.43~1.88)	Z=-5.682	＜0.001
LDL(mmol/L)	2.70±0.97	2.69±0.93	t=0.003	0.958
GGT(U/L)	39.46(20.31~55.72)	19.21(11.95~31.05)	Z=-3.563	＜0.001
sUA(μmmol/L)	363.46±95.75	294.27±92.36	t=12.974	＜0.001
sCr(μmmol/L)	63.20±19.19	58.37±14.93	t=1.723	0.192
sUA/Cr	6.04±1.60	5.05±1.11	t=10.710	0.001

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 轻中重度NAFLD患者临床资料比较

项目	轻度NAFLD组(n=33)	中度NAFLD组(n=31)	重度NAFLD组(n=33)	统计值	P值
男性[例(%)]	23(69.7)	21(67.7)	18(54.5)	χ²=1.931	0.381
年龄(岁)	54(44~60)	42(34~61)	38(32~52)	Z=7.574	0.023
FBS(mmol/L)	5.11(4.39~6.12)	5.34(4.79~7.28)	5.29(4.76~6.12)	Z=2.937	0.230
ALT(U/L)	20.23(14.05~32.45)	45.30(24.20~76.51)	46.55(33.65~77.88)	Z=19.181	＜0.001
AST(U/L)	19.20(15.25~25.65)	26.40(20.00~41.30)	29.55(21.58~46.83)	Z=11.969	0.003
TC(mmol/L)	4.07(3.44~4.73)	4.62(3.57~4.97)	5.03(4.27~5.64)	Z=9.097	0.011
TG(mmol/L)	1.32(0.85~2.39)	1.41(1.05~2.12)	2.16(1.25~2.89)	Z=6.333	0.042
HDL(mmol/L)	1.13(0.98~1.35)	1.14(1.00~1.38)	1.23(1.02~1.45)	Z=1.100	0.577
LDL(mmol/L)	2.51±1.00	2.48±0.85	3.10±0.93	F=4.175	0.019
GGT(U/L)	24.30(16.05~47.80)	40.6(30.00~65.70)	42.15(30.05~57.45)	Z=7.667	0.022
sUA(μmmol/L)	349.55±109.80	368.60±100.52	372.28±76.64	F=0.466	0.629
sCr(μmmol/L)	62.44±16.03	68.21±24.99	59.08±14.32	F=1.855	0.162
sUA/Cr	5.72±1.48	5.95±1.86	6.45±1.42	F=1.648	0.199

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 NAFLD发生的影响因素logistic回归分析

因素	OR	95%CI	B值	Wald值	P值
年龄(岁)	1.056	1.005~1.109	0.055	4.735	0.030
HDL(mmol/L)	0.023	0.003~0.186	-3.788	12.423	＜0.001
sUA/Cr	1.885	1.162~3.060	0.634	6.584	0.010

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(18)

[1]	COBBINA E, AKHLAGHI F. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)-pathogenesis, classification, and effect on drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters[J]. Drug Metab Rev, 2017, 49(2): 197-211. DOI: 10.1080/03602532.2017.1293683.
[2]	National Workshop on Fatty Liver and Alcoholic Liver Disease, Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association; Fatty Liver Expen Committee, Chinese Medical Doctor Association. Guidelines of prevention and treatment for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A 2018 update[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2018, 34(5): 177-186. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2018.02.007. 中华医学会肝病学分会脂肪肝和酒精性肝病学组, 中国医师协会脂肪性肝病专家委员会. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病防治指南(2018年更新版)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2018, 34(5): 177-186. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2018.02.007.
[3]	CHALASANI N, YOUNOSSI Z, LAVINE JE, et al. The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association[J]. Hepatology, 2012, 55(6): 2005-2023. DOI: 10.1002/hep.25762.
[4]	LIU S, SONG JY, PENG J, et al. Association of serum uric acid/creatinine ratio and metabolic syndrome in euthyroid population[J]. J Hyg Res, 2020, 49(3): 374-380. DOI: 10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2020.03.005. 刘思, 宋嘉宜, 彭绩, 等. 甲状腺功能正常人群血尿酸/肌酐比值与代谢综合征的相关性[J]. 卫生研究, 2020, 49(3): 374-380. DOI: 10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2020.03.005.
[5]	National Workshop on Fatty Liver and Alcoholic Liver Disease, Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines of clinical diagnosis and treatment for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease[J]. Chin Hepatol, 2006, 11(1): 68-70. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1704.2006.01.032. 中华医学会肝病学分会脂肪肝和酒精性肝病学组. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病诊疗指南[J]. 肝脏, 2006, 11(1): 68-70. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1704.2006.01.032.
[6]	YOUNOSSI ZM, KOENIG AB, ABDELATIF D, et al. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes[J]. Hepatology, 2016, 64(1): 73-84. DOI: 10.1002/hep.28431.
[7]	BYRNE CD, TARGHER G. NAFLD: A multisystem disease[J]. J Hepatol, 2015, 62(1 Suppl): s47-s64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.12.012.
[8]	MARCUCCILLI M, CHONCHOL M. NAFLD and chronic kidney disease[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2016, 17(4): 562. DOI: 10.3390/ijms17040562.
[9]	CHEN MY, ZHAO CC, LI TT, et al. Serum uric acid levels are associated with obesity but not cardio-cerebrovascular events in Chinese inpatients with type 2 diabetes[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 40009. DOI: 10.1038/srep40009.
[10]	LIMA WG, MARTINS-SANTOS ME, CHAVES VE. Uric acid as a modulator of glucose and lipid metabolism[J]. Biochimie, 2015, 116: 17-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2015.06.025.
[11]	ALI N, RAHMAN S, ISLAM S, et al. The relationship between serum uric acid and lipid profile in Bangladeshi adults[J]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2019, 19(1): 42. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-019-1026-2.
[12]	AFZALI A, WEISS NS, BOYKO EJ, et al. Association between serum uric acid level and chronic liver disease in the United States[J]. Hepatology, 2010, 52(2): 578-589. DOI: 10.1002/hep.23717.
[13]	KAWAMOTO R, NINOMIYA D, AKASE T, et al. Serum uric acid to creatinine ratio independently predicts incident metabolic syndrome among community-dwelling persons[J]. Metab Syndr Relat Disord, 2019, 17(2): 81-89. DOI: 10.1089/met.2018.0055.
[14]	HWANG IC, SUH SY, SUH AR, et al. The relationship between normal serum uric acid and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease[J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2011, 26(3): 386-391. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.3.386.
[15]	MOON SS. Relationship between serum uric acid level and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in pre- and postmenopausal women[J]. Ann Nutr Metab, 2013, 62(2): 158-163. DOI: 10.1159/000346202.
[16]	SPAHIS S, DELVIN E, BORYS JM, et al. Oxidative stress as a critical factor in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease pathogenesis[J]. Antioxid Redox Signal, 2017, 26(10): 519-541. DOI: 10.1089/ars.2016.6776.
[17]	XU C, WAN X, XU L, et al. Xanthine oxidase in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and hyperuricemia: One stone hits two birds[J]. J Hepatol, 2015, 62(6): 1412-1419. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.01.019.
[18]	SEO YB, HAN AL. Association of the serum uric acid-to-creatinine ratio with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease diagnosed by computed tomography[J]. Metab Syndr Relat Disord, 2021, 19(2): 70-75. DOI: 10.1089/met.2020.0086.