中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

白蛋白相关比值对HBV相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者死亡风险的预测价值

曾玉 王航 邓存良 盛云建

引用本文:
Citation:

白蛋白相关比值对HBV相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者死亡风险的预测价值

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2023.11.011
伦理学声明:本研究方案于2023年2月27日经由西南医科大学附属医院临床试验伦理委员会审批,批号:KY2023060。
利益冲突声明:本文不存在任何利益冲突。
作者贡献声明:曾玉负责课题设计,资料分析,撰写论文;王航参与收集数据,修改论文;盛云建、邓存良负责拟定研究方向及写作思路,指导文章撰写、修改及定稿。
详细信息
    通信作者:

    ‍盛云建, sheng200410@163.com (ORCID: 0000-0003-0772-5971)

Value of albumin-related ratios in predicting the risk of death in patients with hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure

More Information
    Corresponding author: SHENG Yunjiang, sheng200410@163.com (ORCID: 0000-0003-0772-5971)
  • 摘要:   目的  比较分析白蛋白相关比值[总胆红素/白蛋白比值(TAR)、肌酐/白蛋白比值(CAR)、凝血酶原时间国际标准化比值/白蛋白比值(IAR)、中性粒细胞计数/白蛋白比值(NAR)和红细胞分布宽度/白蛋白比值(RAR)]对HBV相关慢加急性肝衰竭(HBV-ACLF)患者短期预后的预测价值。  方法  对2017年6月—2022年2月西南医科大学附属医院感染科收治的354例HBV-ACLF患者进行回顾性研究,根据随访3个月时的转归分为生存组(n=272)和死亡组(n=82),记录患者的年龄、性别、并发症以及入院后首次的血常规、肝功能、凝血等检验指标,同时计算白蛋白相关比值、MELD评分。符合正态分布的计量资料两组间比较采用t检验;非正态分布计量资料两组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验;计数资料组间比较采用χ2检验。白蛋白相关比值与MELD评分之间的相关性分析采用Spearman相关性检验。采用Logistic回归分析探讨MELD评分、TAR、CAR、IAR、NAR和RAR与不良预后的关系。采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)下面积(AUC)分析白蛋白相关比值及MELD评分对HBV-ACLF患者短期预后的预测准确性。使用De-Long检验进行AUC之间的比较。  结果  生存组的MELD评分(Z=-8.071)、TAR(Z=-6.695)、CAR(Z=-4.463)、IAR(Z=-7.912)、NAR(Z=-4.061)、RAR(Z=-4.788)比死亡组更低,差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.001)。MELD评分与CAR(r=0.616)、IAR(r=0.733)、TAR(r=0.657)、NAR(r=0.392),RAR(r=0.380)均呈正相关(P值均<0.001)。将MELD评分及白蛋白相关比值进行多因素回归分析,高TAR(OR=1.014,95%CI:1.008~1.020,P<0.001)和高IAR(OR=22.052,95%CI:6.937~70.103,P<0.001)被确定为死亡的独立危险因素。通过绘制白蛋白相关比值及MELD评分的ROC曲线来评估这些指标对死亡率的区分能力,得到相应的AUC值,MELD:0.794、TAR:0.744、CAR:0.663、IAR:0.788、NAR:0.648、RAR:0.674;其中,MELD的敏感度最高为86.59%,而CAR的特异度最高为77.57%。当TAR和IAR联合使用时,其AUC值为0.809,敏感度和特异度分别为76.8%和71.3%。对HBV-ACLF进行亚组分析显示,A型和C型患者TAR和IAR联合使用时,其AUC值最高,分别为0.884、0.733。  结论  TAR、IAR可作为预测HBV-ACLF患者90天死亡率的一种简单有效的预后工具。

     

  • 图  1  总患者人群白蛋白相关比值与MELD评分的相关性

    Figure  1.  Correlations of MELD score with albumin-related ratios in total patients

    图  2  白蛋白相关比值及MELD评分预测HBV-ACLF患者90天死亡率的ROC曲线

    Figure  2.  ROC curve analyses for albumin-related ratios and MELD score for prediction of 90-day mortality in HBV-ACLF patients

    表  1  生存组和死亡组基线特征的比较

    Table  1.   Comparisons of baseline characteristics between the survivors and non-survivors

    指标 生存组(n=272) 死亡组(n=82) 统计值 P
    性别(男/女) 221/51 71/11 χ2=1.241 0.265
    年龄(岁) 46.99±12.54 52.46±11.32 t=-3.541 <0.001
    分型[例(%)] χ2=21.159 <0.001
    A型 144(52.9) 21(25.6)
    B型 14(5.1) 3(3.7)
    C型 114(41.9) 58(70.7)
    腹水(有/无,例) 145/127 70/12 χ2=27.151 <0.001
    肝性脑病(有/无,例) 19/253 30/52 χ2=46.289 <0.001
    肝肾综合征(有/无,例) 3/269 3/79 χ2=1.174 0.279
    上消化道出血(有/无,例) 2/270 5/77 χ2=6.785 0.009
    细菌感染(有/无,例) 152/120 75/7 χ2=34.673 <0.001
    HBV DNA(107 IU/mL) 0.240(0.002~2.270) 0.060(0.001~1.450) Z=-1.066 0.286
    ALT(U/L) 841.90(252.35~1 453.93) 443.95(186.45~1 206.18) Z=-2.638 0.008
    AST(U/L) 510.25(217.53~1 089.83) 342.04(195.25~996.05) Z=-1.555 0.120
    ALP(U/L) 150.65(120.00~186.73) 151.85(122.23~193.63) Z=-0.268 0.788
    GGT(U/L) 118.70(86.53~187.85) 97.10(65.28~148.23) Z=-3.041 0.002
    Alb(g/dL) 3.27±0.48 2.96±0.46 t=5.193 <0.001
    TBil(μmol/L) 251.50(160.88~358.18) 363.12(290.35~482.85) Z=-5.820 <0.001
    DBil(μmol/L) 176.65(115.53~250.96) 240.75(174.15~302.23) Z=-4.795 <0.001
    CREA(μmol/L) 65.25(55.63~73.75) 68.85(57.85~80.53) Z=-2.087 0.037
    INR 1.77(1.54~2.09) 2.29(1.93~3.02) Z=-7.552 <0.001
    WBC(×109/L) 6.41(4.96~8.17) 7.06(5.81~9.06) Z=-2.013 0.044
    NEU(×109/L) 4.39(3.19~6.04) 5.18(4.13~6.63) Z=-2.958 0.003
    Hb(g/L) 135(120~148) 129(115~142) Z=-2.703 0.007
    RDW(%) 14.30(13.50~15.80) 14.90(13.80~17.03) Z=-2.693 0.007
    PLT(×109/L) 118.00(84.00~159.00) 96.00(69.00~126.25) Z=-3.315 0.001
    MELD评分 19.68(17.08~22.49) 24.88(21.96~28.26) Z=-8.071 <0.001
    TAR 80.61(49.01~114.72) 136.86(89.17~164.43) Z=-6.695 <0.001
    CAR 19.44(16.53~23.09) 23.80(19.16~29.15) Z=-4.463 <0.001
    IAR 0.56(0.45~0.69) 0.79(0.63~1.05) Z=-7.912 <0.001
    NAR 1.34(0.94~1.96) 1.80(1.32~2.34) Z=-4.061 <0.001
    RAR 4.47(3.89~5.29) 5.10(4.50~6.09) Z=-4.788 <0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  白蛋白相关比值与MELD评分的Logistic 回归分析

    Table  2.   Logistic regression analysis of albumin-related ratios and MELD score

    指标 单因素分析 多因素分析
    OR 95%CI P OR 95%CI P
    MELD 1.245 1.173~1.321 <0.001
    TAR 1.019 1.013~1.024 <0.001 1.014 1.008~1.020 <0.001
    CAR 1.053 1.026~1.080 <0.001
    IAR 43.623 14.274~133.313 <0.001 22.052 6.937~70.103 <0.001
    NAR 1.516 1.205~1.908 <0.001
    RAR 1.402 1.187~1.655 <0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  不同评分系统预测HBV-ACLF患者总人群90天死亡率的准确性

    Table  3.   Prognostic accuracies of different scoring systems for predicting 90-day mortality in total HBV-ACLF patients

    指标 AUC P 阈值 敏感度(%) 特异度(%) NPV(%) PPV(%)
    MELD评分 0.794 <0.001 20.90 86.59 60.66 93.74 39.94
    TAR 0.744 <0.001 118.86 64.63 77.21 87.84 46.14
    CAR 0.6631)2) <0.001 23.61 53.66 77.57 84.71 41.95
    IAR 0.7883) <0.001 0.67 70.73 74.26 89.36 45.36
    NAR 0.6481)2)4) <0.001 1.48 70.73 57.72 86.72 33.57
    RAR 0.6741)2)4) <0.001 4.38 81.71 47.79 89.64 32.10
    TAR-IAR 0.8092)3)5)6) <0.001 0.20 76.80 71.30 91.05 44.70
    注:与MELD评分比较,1) P<0.001;与TAR比较,2) P<0.05;与CAR比较,3) P<0.001;与IAR比较,4) P<0.001;与NAR比较,5) P<0.001;与RAR比较,6) P<0.001。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  不同评分系统预测A型HBV-ACLF患者90天死亡率的效能

    Table  4.   Prognostic accuracies of different scoring systems for predicting 90-day mortality in patients with type A HBV-ACLF

    指标 AUC P 阈值 敏感度(%) 特异度(%) NPV(%) PPV(%)
    MELD评分 0.858 <0.001 23.01 76.19 86.11 96.13 44.38
    TAR 0.817 <0.001 130.22 61.90 87.50 94.04 41.87
    CAR 0.6761) 0.017 23.42 57.14 85.42 93.19 36.31
    IAR 0.8483) <0.001 0.60 85.71 71.53 97.18 30.46
    NAR 0.7181)4) <0.001 1.67 76.19 72.22 95.42 28.52
    RAR 0.7281)4) <0.001 3.98 100.00 43.75 100.00 20.55
    TAR-IAR 0.8842)3)5)6) <0.001 0.11 90.48 75.7 98.20 35.13
    注:与MELD评分比较,1) P<0.05;与TAR比较,2) P<0.05;与CAR比较,3) P<0.05;与IAR比较,4) P<0.05;与NAR比较,5) P<0.05;与RAR比较,6) P<0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  不同评分系统预测C型HBC-ACLF患者90天死亡率的效能

    Table  5.   Prognostic accuracies of different scoring systems for predicting 90-day mortality in patients with type C HBV-ACLF

    指标 AUC P 阈值 敏感度(%) 特异度(%) NPV(%) PPV(%)
    MELD评分 0.730 <0.001 21.92 77.59 58.77 83.77 48.89
    TAR 0.690 <0.001 121.82 65.52 72.81 80.60 55.05
    CAR 0.6061) 0.024 26.06 43.10 77.10 72.74 48.99
    IAR 0.7123) <0.001 0.69 68.97 66.67 80.87 51.26
    NAR 0.5921)2)4) 0.397 1.48 70.69 50.88 77.35 42.25
    RAR 0.5681)2)4)5) 0.128 4.38 89.66 32.46 86.06 40.29
    TAR-IAR 0.7333)6) <0.001 0.45 53.45 87.72 78.76 68.87
    注:与MELD评分比较,1) P<0.05;与TAR比较,2) P<0.05;与CAR比较,3) P<0.05;与IAR比较,4) P<0.05;与NAR比较,5) P<0.001;与RAR比较,6) P<0.001。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] MOREAU R, GAO B, PAPP M, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure: A distinct clinical syndrome[J]. J Hepatol, 2021, 75( Suppl 1): S27- S35. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.047.
    [2] SARIN SK, KEDARISETTY CK, ABBAS Z, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure: Consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver(APASL) 2014[J]. Hepatol Int, 2014, 8( 4): 453- 471. DOI: 10.1007/s12072-014-9580-2.
    [3] ZHAO RH, SHI Y, ZHAO H, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure in chronic hepatitis B: An update[J]. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2018, 12( 4): 341- 350. DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2018.1426459.
    [4] KARVELLAS CJ, FRANCOZ C, WEISS E. Liver transplantation in acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. Transplantation, 2021, 105( 7): 1471- 1481. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003550.
    [5] LI H, ZHENG J, CHEN LA, et al. The scoring systems in predicting short-term outcomes in patients with hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. Ann Palliat Med, 2020, 9( 5): 3048- 3058. DOI: 10.21037/apm-20-608.
    [6] QUINLAN GJ, MARTIN GS, EVANS TW. Albumin: Biochemical properties and therapeutic potential[J]. Hepatology, 2005, 41( 6): 1211- 1219. DOI: 10.1002/hep.20720.
    [7] BERNARDI M, RICCI CS, ZACCHERINI G. Role of human albumin in the management of complications of liver cirrhosis[J]. J Clin Exp Hepatol, 2014, 4( 4): 302- 311. DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2014.08.007.
    [8] ARROYO V, CLÀRIA J. Acute-on-chronic liver failure, human serum albumin, and immune modulation: The beginning of an exciting adventure[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2018, 16( 5): 633- 636. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.12.008.
    [9] HAN Z, HE X, PENG SQ. Neutrophil count to albumin ratio as a prognostic indicator for HBV-associated decompensated cirrhosis[J]. J Clin Lab Anal, 2021, 35( 4): e23730. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.23730.
    [10] CHOI JS, CHUNG KS, LEE EH, et al. The role of bilirubin to albumin ratio as a predictor for mortality in critically ill patients without existing liver or biliary tract disease[J]. Acute Crit Care, 2020, 35( 1): 24- 30. DOI: 10.4266/acc.2019.00738.
    [11] LU CD, LONG JY, LIU HY, et al. Red blood cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio is associated with all-cause mortality in cancer patients[J]. J Clin Lab Anal, 2022, 36( 5): e24423. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24423.
    [12] NI QW, WANG X, WANG J, et al. The red blood cell distribution width-albumin ratio: A promising predictor of mortality in heart failure patients-A cohort study[J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2022, 527: 38- 46. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.12.027.
    [13] YıLMAZ MF, KARAGÖZ A, ZEREN G, et al. Relationship between in-hospital mortality and creatinine/albumin in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction without standard modifiable risk factors[J]. Biomark Med, 2022, 16( 14): 1043- 1053. DOI: 10.2217/bmm-2022-0241.
    [14] ÜLGER Y, DELIK A. Prognostic value of international normalized ratio-to-albumin ratio and ferritin level in chronic liver patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Gastrointest Cancer, 2022, 53( 4): 1028- 1033. DOI: 10.1007/s12029-021-00738-3.
    [15] Liver Failure and Artificial Liver Group, Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Medical Association; Severe Liver Disease and Artificial Liver Group, Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association. Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of liver failure(2018)[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2019, 35( 1): 38- 44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.01.007.

    中华医学会感染病学分会肝衰竭与人工肝学组, 中华医学会肝病学分会重型肝病与人工肝学组. 肝衰竭诊治指南(2018年版)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2019, 35( 1): 38- 44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.01.007.
    [16] KAMATH PS, WIESNER RH, MALINCHOC M, et al. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease[J]. Hepatology, 2001, 33( 2): 464- 470. DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2001.22172.
    [17] CLÀRIA J, STAUBER RE, COENRAAD MJ, et al. Systemic inflammation in decompensated cirrhosis: Characterization and role in acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. Hepatology, 2016, 64( 4): 1249- 1264. DOI: 10.1002/hep.28740.
    [18] WANG J, HUANG R, YAN XM, et al. Red blood cell distribution width: A promising index for evaluating the severity and long-term prognosis of hepatitis B virus-related diseases[J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2020, 52( 4): 440- 446. DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.12.144.
    [19] QIN J, QIANG L, CHEN W, et al. Red blood cell distribution width is a independent prognostic indicator for mortality in patients with HBV related acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. J South Med Univ, 2018, 38( 11): 1354- 1359. DOI: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2018.11.13.

    秦娇, 强丽, 陈文, 等. 红细胞分布宽度可作为乙型肝炎相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期死亡的独立预测因子[J]. 南方医科大学学报, 2018, 38( 11): 1354- 1359. DOI: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2018.11.13.
    [20] RUI CR, LEVADA-PIRES AC, SILVA EBD, et al. The critical role of cell metabolism for essential neutrophil functions[J]. Cell Physiol Biochem, 2020, 54( 4): 629- 647. DOI: 10.33594/000000245.
    [21] SIMBRUNNER B, TRAUNER M, REIBERGER T, et al. Recent advances in the understanding and management of hepatorenal syndrome[J]. Fac Rev, 2021, 10: 48. DOI: 10.12703/r/10-48.
    [22] CHEN MJ, LI X, TANG SH. Progress of multidimensional evaluation of liver function in prognosis of patients with liver failure[J]. Clin J Med Offic, 2023, 51( 9): 901- 903, 907. DOI: 10.16680/j.1671-3826.2023.09.05.

    陈美娟, 李雪, 汤善宏. 多维度评估肝功能在肝衰竭患者预后中研究进展[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2023, 51( 9): 901- 903, 907. DOI: 10.16680/j.1671-3826.2023.09.05.
    [23] GAO F, CAI MX, LIN MT, et al. Prognostic value of international normalized ratio to albumin ratio among critically ill patients with cirrhosis[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2019, 31( 7): 824- 831. DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001339.
    [24] GAO X, ZHAO CJ, HU SH. Short-term prognostic value of age-bilirubin-international normalized ratio-creatinine score in patients with hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure[J/CD]. Chin J Exp Clin Infect Dis(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16( 2): 108- 114. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2022.02.005.

    高祥, 赵成军, 胡世宏. 年龄-胆红素-国际标准化比率-肌酐评分对乙型肝炎相关慢加急性肝功能衰竭患者短期预后的评估价值[J/CD]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16( 2): 108- 114. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2022.02.005.
    [25] PIERRAKOS C, VELISSARIS D, FELLEITER P, et al. Increased mortality in critically ill patients with mild or moderate hyperbilirubinemia[J]. J Crit Care, 2017, 40: 31- 35. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.01.017.
    [26] LAI M, WANG X, YAO QW, et al. Predictive value of the initial MELD score and its derivative scores for early survival rate after liver transplantation in patients with liver failure[J]. Ogran Transplant, 2022, 13( 4): 489- 494. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2022.04.012.

    赖曼, 王鑫, 姚勤伟, 等. 术后首次MELD评分及其衍生评分对肝衰竭患者肝移植术后早期生存率的预测价值[J]. 器官移植, 2022, 13( 4): 489- 494. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2022.04.012.
  • 加载中
图(2) / 表(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  186
  • HTML全文浏览量:  64
  • PDF下载量:  37
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-02-27
  • 录用日期:  2023-03-29
  • 出版日期:  2023-11-28
  • 分享
  • 用微信扫码二维码

    分享至好友和朋友圈

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回