中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Issue 7
Jul.  2017
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Short-and long-term efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization versus liver resection in treatment of patients with Barcelona stage B multiple hepatocellular carcinoma

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.07.018
  • Received Date: 2016-12-16
  • Published Date: 2017-07-20
  • Objective To investigate the short-and long-term efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) versus liver resection in the treatment of patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B multiple hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) .Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 80 patients with BCLC stage B multiple HCC who were treated from June 2010 to June 2011, and among these patients, 49 underwent liver resection (LR group) and 31 underwent TACE (TACE group) .The postoperative complications, changes in liver function parameters, survival time, and 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were compared between the two groups.The t-test was used for comparison of continuous data between groups, and the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups.The Kaplan-Meier curve was used for survival analysis, The log-rank test was used for conparison between two groups.Results At 1 week after surgery, the LR group and the TACE group had significant increases in total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) , and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (LR group:t=3.181, 2.181, and 2.955, P=0.002, 0.032, and 0.004;TACE group:t=3.109, 3.965, and 4.519, P=0.003, P<0.001, and P<0.001) , and after surgery, the LR group had significantly lower levels of AST and ALT than the TACE group (t=2.094 and 2.111, P=0.040 and 0.038) .Compared with the TACE group, the LR group had significantly higher 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates (75.51%/51.02%/40.82% vs 61.29%/22.58%/9.68%, all P<0.05) and significantly longer median survival time (36.3 months vs 26.5 months, P<0.05) .The LR group had a significantly lower recurrence rate than the TACE group (30.61% vs 67.74%, χ2=10.576, P=0.001) .Conclusion Liver resection has a better effect in the treatment of patients with BCLC stage B multiple HCC than TACE and can improve overall survival and prolong survival time.

     

  • loading
  • [1] JEMAL A, BRAY F, CENTER MM, et al.Global cancer statistics[J].CA Cancer J Clin, 2011, 61 (2) :69-90.
    [2] ZHANG F, ZHUGE YZ, QIU YD, et al.Prognostic accuracy of staging systems in patients with primary liver cancer treated with transarterial chemoembolization[J].J Clin Hepatol, 2011, 27 (4) :378-381. (in Chinese) 张峰, 诸葛宇征, 仇毓东, 等.肝癌分期对肝动脉化疗栓塞术后生存的预测作用[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2011, 27 (4) :378-381.
    [3]DINDO D, DEMARTINES N, CLAVIEN PA.Classification of surgical complications:a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of6336 patients and results of a survey[J].Ann Surg, 2004, 240 (2) :205-213.
    [4]GUO Z, XIANG BD, JIANG JH, et al.Survival comparison between hepatic resection and transarterial chemoembolization for matched patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Chin J Gen Surg, 2015, 30 (4) :290-293. (in Chinese) 郭哲, 向邦德, 姜经航, 等.肝切除与肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗大肝癌的疗效比较[J].中华普通外科杂志, 2015, 30 (4) :290-293.
    [5]LIU YY, LIU XX.International controversy in partial hepatectomy for patients in stage B or C of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer[J].Chin J Dig Surg, 2015, 14 (8) :609-611. (in Chinese) 刘允怡, 刘晓欣.巴塞罗那临床肝癌B期和C期患者施行部分肝切除术治疗的国际争议[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2015, 14 (8) :609-611.
    [6]LIU X, LI LQ, XIANG BD, et al.Efficacy of hepatic resection and transarterial chemoembolization for stage B hepatocellular carcinoma in the barcelona clinic liver cancer classification[J].Chin J Clin Oncol, 2012, 39 (16) :1225-1228. (in Chinese) 刘星, 黎乐群, 向邦德, 等.巴塞罗那肝癌临床分期B期肝细胞性肝癌手术与TACE疗效比较[J].中国肿瘤临床, 2012, 39 (16) :1225-1228.
    [7]WU K, YANG XH, WANG JP.Risk factors for liver injury after liver cancer surgery in elderly patients[J].Chongqing Med, 2014, 43 (25) :3365-3367. (in Chinese) 吴凯, 杨晓辉, 王建平.老年患者肝癌术后肝损伤的相关因素分析[J].重庆医学, 2014, 43 (25) :3365-3367.
    [8] WU FX, ZHANG YQ, XIANG BD, et al.Hepatic resection versus transaterial chemoembolization for BCLC stage B Child-Pugh A HCCpatients[J].Chin J Hepatobiliary Surg, 2013, 19 (1) :23-28. (in Chinese) 吴飞翔, 张涌泉, 向邦德, 等.巴塞罗那分期B期肝功能ChildPugh A级肝细胞癌患者手术与经肝动脉化疗栓塞疗效的比较[J].中华肝胆外科杂志, 2013, 19 (1) :23-28.
    [9]ZHONG JH, QI LN.Hepatectomy brings good survival benefits to patients with BCLC stage B/C hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Chin JOncol Prev Treat, 2013, 30 (4) :377-377. (in Chinese) 钟鉴宏, 齐鲁楠.肝切除术治疗BCLC-B期/C期肝细胞性肝癌患者的生存获益较佳[J].中国癌症防治杂志, 2013, 30 (4) :377-377.
    [10]MA L, LIU W, ZHONG JH, et al.A comparison of survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with BCLC stage B and C between hepatic resection and transarterial chemoembolization[J].Guangx Med J, 2012, 34 (8) :963-965. (in Chinese) 马良, 刘玮, 钟鉴宏, 等.手术与经肝动脉导管化疗栓塞治疗中晚期肝癌生存率的比较[J].广西医学, 2012, 34 (8) :963-965.
    [11]ZHAO WC, YANG N, ZHU N, et al.Patients with multiple hepatocellular carcinomas within the UCSF criteria have outcomes after curative resection similar to patients within the BCLC early-stage criteria[J].World J Surg, 2012, 36 (8) :1811-1823.
    [12]LIN CT, HSU KF, CHEN TW, et al.Comparing hepatic resection and transarterial chemoembolization for Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage B hepatocellular carcinoma:change for treatment o choice?[J].World J Surg, 2010, 34 (9) :2155-2161.
    [13]YIN L, LI H, LI AJ, et al.Partial hepatectomy vs transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for resectable multiple hepatocellular carcinoma beyond Milan criteria:a RCT[J].J Hepatol, 2014, 61 (1) :82-88.
    [14] XIA HT, GUO GH, HUANG XQ, et al.Variations in serum level o cytokines associated with vascular endothelial cells before and after treatment with either TACE or liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Chin J Hepatobiliary Surg, 2012, 18 (18) :23-26. (in Chinese) 夏红天, 郭广宏, 黄晓强, 等.肝动脉化疗栓塞前后血管内皮细胞相关细胞因子的变化[J].中华肝胆外科杂志, 2012, 18 (18) :23-26.
    [15]MARELLI L, STIGLIANO R, TRIANTOS C, et al.Transarteria therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma:which technique is more effective?A systematic review of cohort and randomized studies[J].Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2007, 30 (1) :6-25.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2275) PDF downloads(434) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return