中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Issue 6
Jun.  2018
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Evaluation and analysis of the current guidelines for acute pancreatitis using Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Ⅱ

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2018.06.019
  • Received Date: 2017-11-16
  • Published Date: 2018-06-20
  • Objective To investigate the quality of the guidelines for acute pancreatitis in China and foreign countries using Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. Methods According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, Wanfang Data, CNKI, VIP, Pub Med, Cochrane, and Elsevier were searched for the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute pancreatitis published from 2005 to 2016. As for the guidelines included, the information on the institutions that issued the guidelines, the basis for evidence evaluation, and the year of issuance was collected. The AGREE II instrument was used to evaluate the quality of the guidelines included in this study. The independent-samples nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the scores of guidelines in China and foreign countries. Results A total of 10 guidelines/consensus statements were included, among which 4 were published by China and 6 were published by foreign countries. The AGREE II results of 10 guidelines evaluated by three reviewers had an interclass correlation coefficient of> 0. 75 (all P < 0. 05) , which showed good consistency. The evaluation results showed that these guidelines had high mean scores of“Scope and Purpose”and“Clarity of Presentation” (50. 37% and 53. 15%, respectively) , and the guidelines in foreign countries had significantly higher mean scores than the guidelines in China (64. 51% vs 29. 16%, Z =-2. 558, P = 0. 011; 73. 77% vs 22. 22%, Z =-2. 574, P = 0. 010) . The guidelines had low mean scores of “Stakeholder Involvement”, “Rigour of Development”, and“Applicability” (28. 70%, 30. 49%, and 19. 17%, respectively) , and the guidelines in foreign countries had a significantly higher mean score of“Rigour of Development”than the guidelines in China (48. 96% vs 2. 78%, Z =-2. 557, P = 0. 011) . All guidelines had a mean score of“Editorial Independence”of 41. 39%, and the guidelines in foreign countries had a significantly higher mean score than the guidelines in China (68. 98% vs 0, Z =-2. 648, P = 0. 008) . The recommendation levels of the guidelines in China and foreign countries were C and B, respectively. Conclusion “Stakeholder Involvement”, “Rigour of Development”, and“Applicability”of the guidelines for acute pancreatitis need to be improved. The guidelines for acute pancreatitis in foreign countries are evidence-based guidelines and can be used after appropriate revision. The overall quality of the guidelines in China are inferior to those in foreign countries in the aspects of “Rigour of Development”, “Applicability”, and“Editorial Independence”, and therefore, it is recommended to further regulate the drafting and editing of evidence-based guidelines for acute pancreatitis in China, in order to promote the standard diagnosis and treatment of acute pancreatitis in China.

     

  • loading
  • [1]The Editorial Committee of the Chinese Journal of Gastroenterology, The Editorial Committee of the Chinese Journal of pancreatic disease, The editorial board of the Chinese Journal of digestion.Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute pancreatitis in China (Shanghai, 2013) [J].J Clin Hepatol, 2013, 29 (9) :656-660. (in Chinese) 中华医学会消化病学分会胰腺疾病学组, 《中华胰腺病杂志》编辑委员会, 《中华消化杂志》编辑委员会.中国急性胰腺炎诊治指南 (2013年, 上海) [J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2013, 29 (9) :656-660.
    [2]AGREE Scientific.Appraisal of guidelines for research&evaluation II instrument[EB/OL].http://www.agreetrust.org/agree-ii/.
    [3]RADWAN M, SARI A, SASHIDIAN A, et al.Appraising the methodological quality of the clinical practice guideline for diabetes mellitus using the AGREE II instrument:A methodological evaluation[J].JRSM Open, 2017, 8 (2) :1-8.
    [4]BROUWERS M, KHO ME, BROWMAN GP, et al.AGREE II:advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care[J].Can Med Assoc J, 2010, 182 (18) :e839.
    [5]CUI SC, HOU HY, LI YP, et al.Clinical practice guidelines on infertinity:a systematic review[J].Chin J Evid-based Med, 2013, 13 (8) :947-954. (in Chinese) 崔世超, 侯海燕, 李幼平, 等.不孕症临床指南的系统评价[J].中国循证医学杂志, 2013, 13 (8) :947-954.
    [6]TOOULI J, BROOKE-SMITH M, BASSI C, et al.UK guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis[J].Gut, 2005, 54 (Suppl3) :1-9.
    [7]PEZZILLI R, ZERBI A, di CARLO V, et al.Practical guidelines for acute pancreatitis[J].Pancreatology, 2010, 10 (5) :523-535.
    [8]TENNER S, BAILLIE J, DEWITT J, et al.American College of Gastroenterology guideline:Management of acute pancreatitis[J].Am J Gastroenterol, 2013, 108 (9) :1400-1415.
    [9]Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines.IAP/APAevidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis[J].Pancreatology, 2013, 13 (4 Suppl 2) :e1-e15.
    [10]YOKOE M, TAKADA T, MAYUMI T, et al.Japanese guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis:Japanese Guidelines 2015[J].J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2015, 22 (6) :405-432.
    [11]GREENBERG JA, HSU J, BAWAZEER M, et al.Clinical practice guideline:Management of acute pancreatitis[J].Can J Surg, 2016, 59 (2) :128-140.
    [12]Chinese Medical Doctor Association Department of Emergency Physicians.Clinical practice guide for acute acute pancreatitis in China[J].Chin J Crit Care Med, 2013, 33 (12) :1057-1071. (in Chinese) 中国医师协会急诊医师分会.中国急诊急性胰腺炎临床实践指南[J].中国急救医学, 2013, 33 (12) :1057-1071.
    [13]Group of Pancreas Surgery, Chinese Society of Surgery, Chinese Medical Association.Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis (2014) [J].J Clin Hepatol, 2015, 31 (1) :17-20. (in Chinese) 中华医学会外科学分会胰腺外科学组.急性胰腺炎诊治指南 (2014) [J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2015, 31 (1) :17-20.
    [14]Professional Committee of Pancreatic Disease, Chinese Medical Doctor Association.Chinese consensus on the multidisciplinary treatment (MDT) of acute pancreatitis[J].J Clin Hepatol, 2015, 31 (11) :1770-1775. (in Chinese) 中国医师协会胰腺病学专业委员会.中国急性胰腺炎多学科诊治共识意见[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2015, 31 (11) :1770-1775.
    [15]WEI ML, LIU M.Analysis of clinical guidelines developed based on evidence in China[J].Chin J Evid-based Med, 2013, 13 (8) :927-932. (in Chinese) 卫茂玲, 刘鸣.中国临床指南循证制定的方法学现状分析[J].中国循证医学杂志, 2013, 13 (8) :927-932.
    [16]ZHAN SY.Development of clinical practice guidelines should be based on scientific methodology[J].Chin J Pediatr, 2009, 47 (3) :163-166. (in Chinese) 詹思延.临床实践指南的制定应当科学、规范[J].中华儿科杂志, 2009, 47 (3) :163-166.
    [17]ZHANG ZG.“International Association/American Association of pancreatic pancreatic on acute pancreatitis treatment guidelines”based on the medical certificate[J].J Hepatobiliary Surg, 2014, 22 (3) :233-234. (in Chinese) 张志功.《国际胰腺协会/美国胰腺协会循证医学基础上的急性胰腺炎处理指南》读后感[J].肝胆外科杂志, 2014, 22 (3) :233-234.
    [18]JIANG ZM, ZHAN SY, JIA XW, et al.Basic methods and procedures for formulating/revising the“guide for clinical diagnosis and treatment”[J].Natl Med J China, 2016, 96 (4) :250-253. (in Chinese) 蒋朱明, 詹思延, 贾晓巍, 等.制订/修订《临床诊疗指南》的基本方法及程序[J].中华医学杂志, 2016, 96 (4) :250-253.
    [19]VINCENZI B, NAPOLITANO A, SANTINI D, et al.Evidencebased guidelines:Improving AGREEment on consistence evaluation[J].J Bone Oncol, 2012, 1 (1) :30-34.
    [20]GUO Q.Evidence-based evaluation and implementation of clinical practice guidelines[J].J Clin Pediatr, 2011, 29 (3) :288-290. (in Chinese) 郭琴.临床实践指南的循证评价和应用[J].临床儿科杂志, 2011, 29 (3) :288-290.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2027) PDF downloads(349) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return