中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Issue 9
Sep.  2016
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Advances in Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method for diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury and its comparison with structured expert opinion process

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2016.09.014
  • Received Date: 2016-08-03
  • Published Date: 2016-09-20
  • Up to now,the diagnosis of drug- induced liver injury( DILI) still relies on the exclusive method,and the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method( RUCAM) is the most commonly used scale. Since the release of the first version of RUCAM scale in 1993,the second version was released in 2015,in which the definition and scoring criteria of each key element were revised appropriately and explained in detail. The Structured Expert Opinion Process( SEOP) was designed by the workgroup of DILI network prospective study,but since it is too complicated and time- and energy- consuming,its application in clinical practice is limited. This article introduces the research and development history and application method of RUCAM,as well as the modifications made in the 2015 version of RUCAM,and briefly compares the difference in bias between RUCAM and SEOP in the diagnosis of DILI. It is pointed out that both RUCAM and SEOP have marked interobserver and intraobserver variabilities,and therefore,it is necessary to explore a more objective,reproducible,accurate,and convenient strategy for the diagnosis of DILI.

     

  • loading
  • [1]DANAN G,TESCHKE R.RUCAM in drug and herb induced liver injury:the update[J].Int J Mol Sci,2016,17(1):14-46.
    [2]DANAN G,BENICHOU C.Causality assessment of adverse reactions to drugs——I.A novel method based on the conclusions of international consensus meetings:application to drug-induced liver injuries[J].J Clin Epidemiol,1993,46(11):1323-1330.
    [3]AITHAL GP,WATKINS PB,ANDRADE RJ,et al.Case definition and phenotype standardization in drug-induced liver injury[J].Clin Pharmacol Ther,2011,89(6):806-815.
    [4]ROCKEY DC,SEEFF LB,ROCHON J,et al.Causality assessment in drug-induced liver injury using a structured expert opinion process:comparison to the roussel-uclaf causality assessment method[J].Hepatology,2010,51(6):2117-2126.
    [5]BEGAUD B,EVREUX JC,JOUGLARD J,et al.Unexpected or toxic drug reaction assessment(imputation).Actualization of the method used in France[J].Therapie,1985,40(2):111-118.
    [6]DANAN G.Causality assessment of drug-induced liver injury.Hepatology Working Group[J].J Hepatol,1988,7(1):132-136.
    [7]BENICHOU C.Criteria of drug-induced liver disorders.Report of an international consensus meeting[J].J Hepatol,1990,11(2):272-276.
    [8]HAYASHI PH.Causality assessment in drug-induced liver injury[J].Semin Liver Dis,2009,29(4):348-356.
    [9]CHALASANI NP,HAYASHI PH,BONKOVSKY HL,et al.ACG Clinical Guideline:the diagnosis and management of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury[J].Am J Gastroenterol,2014,109(7):950-966.
    [10]Drug-induced Liver Disease Study Group,Chinese.Guidelines for the management of drug-induced liver injury[J].J Clin Hepatol,2015,31(11):1752-1769.(in Chinese)中华医学会肝病学分会药物性肝病学组.药物性肝损伤诊治指南[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2015,31(11):1752-1769.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2909) PDF downloads(505) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return