中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

晚期氧化蛋白产物对慢加急性肝衰竭氧化应激的监测

作者: 孙书凯 发布日期: 2012-05-30 阅读次数:
  • 分享到:

用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

 目的:氧化应激是慢加急性肝衰竭的重要发病机制。该研究目的在于调查氧化蛋白产物水平能否监测慢加急性肝衰竭患者的氧化应激水平。更深入点,我们的目的在于研究血浆置换疗法,并确定它能否清楚AOPP方法:我们采用分光光度计法测量50例慢加急性肝衰竭患者、30例代偿期肝硬化患者、30例慢性乙型肝炎患者和50例健康对照者的AOPP水平。同时也检测了慢加急性肝衰竭患者在血浆置换治疗前后的血AOPP浓度。检测血清细胞角蛋白18水平,一种凋亡的标志,用来研究AOPP与慢加急性肝衰竭患者中细胞凋亡的关系。结果ACLFAOPP水平明显高于代偿期肝硬化组、慢性乙型肝炎组和健康对照组(分别为69.45 +/- 29.04 μmol/L 19.67 +/- 7.02 μmol/L, 26.75  +/- 5.21 μmol/L21.35 +/- 6.15 μmol/L; P < 0.001)。血AOPP水平与总胆红素、 Child–Pugh评分、终末期肝病模型评分和细胞角蛋白18呈正相关。在ACLF患者中,未存活者的AOPP水平高于存活者。血AOPP水平是ACLF患者不良预后的预测指标,其最佳临界值为74.21 μmol/L。多因素Cox回归分析证明AOPP是预后的独立危险因素。AOPP与预后有关,AOPP的动态变化要早于总胆红素的变化。在PE治疗后AOPP水平降至34.65 +/- 18.14 μmol/L结论:晚期氧化蛋白产物适合用来监测慢加急性肝衰竭患者的氧化应激水平。AOPP的增加可能作为一个重要的生物学标记,预示不良结果。另外,PE治疗对减少AOPP有效。

 

吉林大学第一医院肝胆胰内科  孙书凯  摘译

本文首次发表于[Hepatol Res. 2012;42(2):171-180.]

 

Monitoring oxidative stress in acute-on-chronic liver failure by advanced oxidation protein products

 

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Increased oxidative stress is important in the pathogenesis of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). This study aimed to investigate whether advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP) levels can monitor oxidative stress of ACLF patients. Furthermore, we aimed to study plasma exchange(PE) treatment and determine whether it can eliminate AOPP.

METHODS: We measured AOPP levels in 50 ACLF patients, 30 patients with compensated liver cirrhosis (CR), 30 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and 50 healthy controls by spectrophotometric assay. AOPP concentrations were also measured before and after PE treatment in ACLF patients. As an apoptosis marker, serum cytokeratin 18 (CK18 M 30) levels were detected to investigate the relationship between AOPP and apoptosis in ACLF patients.

RESULTS: Significantly higher AOPP levels at admission were found in patients with ACLF compared with CR,CHB and healthy controls (69.45 +/- 29.04 μmol/L vs. 19.67 +/- 7.02 μmol/L, 26.75 +/- 5.21 μmol/L and 21.35 +/- 6.15 μmol/L,respectively; P < 0.001). There was a positive relationship with total bilirubin, Child–Pugh, model for end-stage liver disease scores and CK18 M 30. In ACLF patients, AOPP levels were higher in non-survivors than survivors. An AOPP cut-off of 74.21 μmol/L was used for predicting poor prognosis.

Multi-variate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that AOPP were independent risk factors for prognosis. Dynamic change of AOPP levels associated with prognosis appeared earlier than total bilirubin. Following PE treatment, AOPP levels reduced to34.65 +/- 18.14 μmol/L (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: Advanced oxidation protein products were suitable for monitoring the levels of oxidative stress in ACLF patients. Increased AOPP may serve as an important biological marker of worse outcome. In addition, PE therapy was effective in reducing AOPP.

 

  • 分享到:

用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

作者: 孙书凯 发布日期: 2012-05-30 阅读次数: